Junkie Drug Heads, Chiropractors, and Non-Epidemiologists

An anti-vaccine chiropractor said this:

billydemoss

Alright, alright, he wrote it. What article is he pointing us “junkie drug heads” who vaccinate to? An article by our old friend Peter Doshi, PhD. If you remember, I told you how that non-epidemiologist was trying to do epidemiology and only ended up feeding the anti-vaccine people like the chiropractor above. Further, I’ve told you how Doshi has yet to answer whether or not he still thinks that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS. Aside from all the other problems that the non-epidemiologist manages to include in his article, the article is an opinion piece from a non-epidemiologist.

The non-epidemiologist clearly does not understand the epidemiology of influenza. He doesn’t understand that not all cases of influenza are reportable, and neither are the lab tests’ results. He doesn’t understand that epidemiologists only know about deaths from the surveillance that they do, and that most of those deaths are reported only because deaths in children are reportable while adult deaths are not. He tells us that the flu is not a big deal and that the vaccine doesn’t really work, even though he’s been told that he’s wrong and it’s been pointed out in the very meta-analysis that he collaborated on that the flu vaccine has a moderate benefit to it, one outweighing any of the risks from the vaccine. And the non-epidemiologist prances around anti-vaccine conferences with his credentials, making the cranks use him and his opinions as justification for being anti-vaccine.

So what does the non-epidemiologist’s opinion piece say, anyway? Let’s start with the abstract:

“Officials and professional societies treat influenza as a major public health threat for which the annual vaccine offers a safe and effective solution. In this article, I challenge these basic assumptions. I show that there is no good evidence that vaccines reduce serious complications of influenza, the outcomes the policy is meant to address. Moreover, promotional messages conflate “influenza” (disease caused by influenza viruses) with “flu” (a syndrome with many causes, of which influenza viruses appear to be a minor contributor). This lack of precision causes physicians and potential vaccine recipients to have unrealistic assumptions about the vaccine’s potential benefit, and impedes dissemination of the evidence on nonpharmaceutical interventions against respiratory diseases. In addition, there are potential vaccine-related harms, as unexpected and serious adverse effects of influenza vaccines have occurred. I argue that decisions surrounding influenza vaccines need to include a discussion of these risks and benefits.”

Actually, let’s just stop right there. It’s the same stuff he’s been touting left and right under the guise of being an expert on epidemiology, influenza, and immunizations. He isn’t. He’s just some poor post-doc wannabe who likes the accolades he gets from vaccine deniers (who are a lot like AIDS deniers, interestingly enough). There is no good evidence? How about this, this, this, this, this, and this? Are we all wrong? Because the only “bad” think anti-vaccine activists attribute to the flu vaccine are things that real scientists and real epidemiologists have ruled out using real science and publishing it (not opinion pieces).

Physicians don’t know the difference between “influenza” and the “flu”? Really? Then why do they only test people (on the average and in the long run as one of my biostatistician colleagues says) who exhibit clear signs and symptoms of influenza? Doshi is just playing with words. And, like a true anti-vaccine fanatic, he exaggerates the risks of influenza. Like any other nut, because it’s not 100% safe, it’s 100% the excrement of Satan. He “argue(s) that decisions surrounding influenza vaccines need to include a discussion of these risks and benefits”… Why? Because they don’t? You think we in public health don’t look at the evidence for and against before recommending any vaccination? In his mind, we probably don’t.

Non-epidemiologists who think they’re epidemiologists aside, note how the anti-vaccine chiropractor in the screen shot above just goes on some sort of lunatic rant about illegal drug use and vaccines. It doesn’t really make sense, but, yet, not much of what they say makes sense. If I didn’t know any better, I’d bet that we don’t exist in the same planes of reality.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Junkie Drug Heads, Chiropractors, and Non-Epidemiologists

  1. So, NOW, JAMA should be listened to. Never mind all the actual science that goes in there that he and other anti-vaxxers ignore. Never mind this is an opinion piece that just point-blank flies in the face of logic and the most basic of influenza epidemiology. Plus, I’m personally offended that he thinks education deliberately confounds “influenza” and “flu” in the public mindset. Um, no, I specifically go out of my way to teach that WAY to many things are called flu that aren’t. Chances are that person in the cold meds aisle announcing he has “the flu” doesn’t, as actual influenza makes it difficult to get to the bathroom, let alone behind the wheel of a car.

    Besides, I don’t give a crap if the shot only minimally reduces my chances of requiring hospitalization, as the young, healthy adult Doshi always seems to be discussing. I care about the elderly person, or cancer patient, or child, standing behind me in the 24-48 hours when I’m contagious but not actively symptomatic.

  2. Of course you wouldn’t catch the chiro you mentioned (nor any other chiro) administering vaccinations because they aren’t qualified to do so. One of the reasons why I find it so amusing when a doctor wannabe rails against medications they don’t even have authority to prescribe.

  3. I find it fascinating that he equates L-dopa with vaccines. Especially as there is no vaccine in existence that uses L-dopa.

    That aside, there was that bit of a bother back in 1918. Not a big deal, only 500 million people sickened, between 50 and 100 million killed, but it’s not a big deal and we should ignore that possibility.
    After all, the 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic was due to the increased global travel from the first world war. We don’t have that much global travel now, do we?
    Birds now stay home as well, right?

    Ironically, this week’s MMWR directly disproves the idiot PhD’s nonsense.
    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6249a2.htm?s_cid=mm6249a2_w

    I believe that his PhD is in history.

      • I’ve been on the mailing list for decades.
        An interesting article this week was three deaths due to lyme carditis. I was surprised that such a slow moving infection was missed for long enough to cause death.
        Once symptoms of carditis became apparent, a blood culture should have revealed the organism.

      • Well, that most certainly qualifies him as an expert in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society.
        Where in that list is medicine or epidemiology?

        Apparently, the quality of education from MIT has significantly lowered. Critical thinking is no longer taught there, to judge from that individual.

Comments are closed.